Perhaps it was that the reader sounded like a pretentious asshole. I'm also wondering if the content was truly representative of Aristotle's philosophy - as this book just seemed to define some really common things like contradiction, ideas versus actuality, etc. In that sense it was almost a waste of time.
I also found some concepts strange and not what I believe, which blows my mind because I can't imagine that I am more insightful than the father of modern philosophy. I'll have to explore other books about the teaching of Aristotle to have a firm conclusion about that.
No comments:
Post a Comment